Prime 95 torture test

Author: v | 2025-04-25

★★★★☆ (4.2 / 1163 reviews)

Download basics payroll state 2015

(tl;dr what's your preferred application for stability testing out of y-cruncher and Prime 95? If neither, which and why?) After trying Prime 95 (custom AVX2 torture test), I couldn't get the (tl;dr what's your preferred application for stability testing out of y-cruncher and Prime 95? If neither, which and why?) After trying Prime 95 (custom AVX2 torture test), I couldn't get the

Download winstep nexus dock 15.7

Prime 95 torture test - YouTube

Memtest86+ #9 try prime 95 with small fft which will fit in your cache (to rule out cpu without touching memory)I think it's a chipset voltage issue. chipset voltages could affect memory. or maybe not enough volts to your memory. Thread Starter #10 prime 95 testTried prime95 torture test from FFT" (few times) and "In-place large FFT" worked OK, while it reported error for "Blend" test right away (see the screenshot).Where is that stress.txt file it says I should read? prime95_screen.PNG 44 KB · Views: 1,735 #11 Sounds memoryish, try Memtest86+ Thread Starter #12 DRAM voltagevgta88 / bobnova,indeed memory looks to be a likely culprit... I've increased the DRAM voltage in BIOS to 1.8v (from auto, about 1.5v-1.6v) and now both Lynx and Prime95 report no errors so far. I ran Lynx with 20k problem size (3GB) and tried all three mods in Prime95.By the way, bobnova, I did run memtest86, 2 passes, no errors (see one of the posts above).Thanks a lot for your help guys! #13 So you did, i missed that, sorry.1.8v is a lot for DDR3 ram, is it rated at that voltage? Thread Starter #14 memorey voltageYou are right, this memory is rated 1.65v. I am a noob, so what do I know . I changed the voltage to 1.65 and doing testing again. One Lynx and one Prome95 "blend" tests were ok. #15 Excellent, hopefully that was the only issue. #16 Make sure if you want to run your memory higher than 1.65V for. (tl;dr what's your preferred application for stability testing out of y-cruncher and Prime 95? If neither, which and why?) After trying Prime 95 (custom AVX2 torture test), I couldn't get the (tl;dr what's your preferred application for stability testing out of y-cruncher and Prime 95? If neither, which and why?) After trying Prime 95 (custom AVX2 torture test), I couldn't get the (tl;dr what's your preferred application for stability testing out of y-cruncher and Prime 95? If neither, which and why?) After trying Prime 95 (custom AVX2 torture test), I couldn't get the (tl;dr what's your preferred application for stability testing out of y-cruncher and Prime 95? If neither, which and why?) After trying Prime 95 (custom AVX2 torture test), I couldn't get the If your question is specific to Prime 95 (RC5) then my answer would be: BR BR BR Prime 95 Torture Test does a very good job of B isolating /B processor/memory/cache stability issues, and is I see many bragging about running a Prime 95 torture test for 24 hours, when I downloaded Prime 95 it said that it would find any OC errors very quickly. It becomes a torture test only if your system cannot handle the heat or deliver the voltages - but then again the various components will slow down if some measurement gets too far out of (tl;dr what's your preferred application for stability testing out of y-cruncher and Prime 95? If neither, which and why?) After trying Prime 95 (custom AVX2 torture test), I couldn't get the clocks low enough and the max. reported CPU sensor In blend mode, ive not yet tried any other tests, once i seen worker 4 had stopped i stopped the test completely as i didnt want to potentially damage the system. None of the workers actually reported any problems, just number 4 stopped working 1 hour 30mins into the test, but it reported no errors.motherboard temps didnt go beyond 29c the whole test and all voltages on the board seemed stable.I did a quick google search of the error and i seen people had the issue when using 32bit windows mostly, there didnt seem to be any explanation why but i didnt dig too deeply.How much would you recommend i potentially increase the cpu voltage by? and in what steps, 0.25? more? Would it also be worthwhile trying to add to the multiplier more to try get the highest clock speed for the voltage used? Ive never overclocked a machine before so im not sure how much headroom i have left with multipliers,voltage and also core temps. I want it to run its best with the current air cooled setup, if 4.3ghz OC is the most i can get then il be happy with thatThanks again for your time : ) #5 Torture test your CPU with Prime95 Installation And Running TestsThere maybe minor changes in the GUI of Prime 95 but the what to do is still as valid as ever to get to where most of us test. The third image at the link above shows Run a

Comments

User1387

Memtest86+ #9 try prime 95 with small fft which will fit in your cache (to rule out cpu without touching memory)I think it's a chipset voltage issue. chipset voltages could affect memory. or maybe not enough volts to your memory. Thread Starter #10 prime 95 testTried prime95 torture test from FFT" (few times) and "In-place large FFT" worked OK, while it reported error for "Blend" test right away (see the screenshot).Where is that stress.txt file it says I should read? prime95_screen.PNG 44 KB · Views: 1,735 #11 Sounds memoryish, try Memtest86+ Thread Starter #12 DRAM voltagevgta88 / bobnova,indeed memory looks to be a likely culprit... I've increased the DRAM voltage in BIOS to 1.8v (from auto, about 1.5v-1.6v) and now both Lynx and Prime95 report no errors so far. I ran Lynx with 20k problem size (3GB) and tried all three mods in Prime95.By the way, bobnova, I did run memtest86, 2 passes, no errors (see one of the posts above).Thanks a lot for your help guys! #13 So you did, i missed that, sorry.1.8v is a lot for DDR3 ram, is it rated at that voltage? Thread Starter #14 memorey voltageYou are right, this memory is rated 1.65v. I am a noob, so what do I know . I changed the voltage to 1.65 and doing testing again. One Lynx and one Prome95 "blend" tests were ok. #15 Excellent, hopefully that was the only issue. #16 Make sure if you want to run your memory higher than 1.65V for

2025-04-05
User6652

In blend mode, ive not yet tried any other tests, once i seen worker 4 had stopped i stopped the test completely as i didnt want to potentially damage the system. None of the workers actually reported any problems, just number 4 stopped working 1 hour 30mins into the test, but it reported no errors.motherboard temps didnt go beyond 29c the whole test and all voltages on the board seemed stable.I did a quick google search of the error and i seen people had the issue when using 32bit windows mostly, there didnt seem to be any explanation why but i didnt dig too deeply.How much would you recommend i potentially increase the cpu voltage by? and in what steps, 0.25? more? Would it also be worthwhile trying to add to the multiplier more to try get the highest clock speed for the voltage used? Ive never overclocked a machine before so im not sure how much headroom i have left with multipliers,voltage and also core temps. I want it to run its best with the current air cooled setup, if 4.3ghz OC is the most i can get then il be happy with thatThanks again for your time : ) #5 Torture test your CPU with Prime95 Installation And Running TestsThere maybe minor changes in the GUI of Prime 95 but the what to do is still as valid as ever to get to where most of us test. The third image at the link above shows Run a

2025-03-28
User5900

Fréquence raisonnable ([email protected] ) sachant qu'il peut monter plus haut en fréquence mais le rodage j'y crois donc j'essaies je pense que qd je v le conaitre mieux ce petit prog je v l'adorer mais le pb avec l'hyper treading c qu'il n'occupe au maxi 50% du proco donc il faut faire tourner une autre appli en sus style prime 95en tous cas bien content que tu m'ais fait connaitre ce petit progthx VandenMembreMessages : 110QUOTE mais le pb avec l'hyper treading c qu'il n'occupe au maxi 50% du proco donc il faut faire tourner une autre appli en sus style prime 95Et ça le fait aussi avec d'autres logiciels ?? Pasque ça craint si t'a que 50% du CPU pour les aplis pas optimisées hyper treading ??!!Sinon suis intéréssé par tes conclusions (moi sur xp2400+/2100+ le fourier est le + teriblle pour le CPU et le sorting algo le + terrible pour la ram) ...Bon tests et sinon pour le rodage j'aurrai tendance a être pour ça peu pas faire de mal de toutes façont.shirasayaMembreMessages : 60ben j'ai mis au proco, durant une nuit Hot cpu avec du prime 95 pour utiliser les 2 parties du HT de mon P4Cet résultat au réveil-> reboot de chez reboot (ça lui a pas plu) donc ça torture comme il faut le cpu... (en plus j'étais pas au max de fréquence...ça promets pour le reste on verra mais il est bien comme logicielj'aime bienVandenMembreMessages : 110OCCT ---> bof boftest OCTT ok, Nuit de torture, Retest OCCT okHot Cpu : plantage en 10s (Incappable de me faire un seul fast fourier !!!!!) obligé de baisser le fsb de 4 Mhz pour que le fourier passe !!!Edit : Cert sur un xp2100+ presque mort DuKiCloCkMembreMessages : 794on le DL ou ?DuKiCloCkMembreMessages : 794 : 7063 (lecture MP3 +F@H)ratio : 2.85g pas encors tresté la fonction burn !! M'enfin, vu que mon pc est stable sous OCCT et avec F@H 24h/24 !! VandenMembreMessages : 110Test pas le burn mais choisi juste fast fourier transforms Comme Algo (ds option) et fais tourner 6h (comme mon screen)VandenMembreMessages : 110Moi téléchargé sur E-Donkey ... en version completteshirasaya t'a vu y a une option hyper treading (qu'est grisé pour moi --> normal AMD) :shirasayaMembreMessages : 60 pour l'HT, je l'ai en coché mais qd tu regardes ds l'utilisation cpu sous windozzzz il me met au max 50% et c tout mais bon ça n'empeche qu'il n'est pas stable alors deundeunMembreMessages : 9Ben moi je dis +1 avec burnK7, c'est le seul jusqu'a présent a faire planter mon CPU a certaines frequences...Mais j'ai jamais essayé Hot CPUsilmiumMembreMessages : 531je me pose la question quand je relis le debut du topicavez

2025-04-09
User7110

On Control PanelUnder Programs click the Uninstall a Program link. Select Ultrasurf and right click, then select UninstallChange. Click Yes to confirm the uninstallation. How do I uninstall Ultrasurf in Windows XP Click StartClick on Control PanelClick the Add or Remove Programs icon. Click on Ultrasurf, then click RemoveUninstall. Click Yes to confirm the uninstallation. How do I uninstall Ultrasurf in Windows 9. Me, NT, 2. 00. 0 Click StartClick on Control PanelDouble click the AddRemove Programs icon. Select Ultrasurf and right click, then select UninstallChange. Click Yes to confirm the uninstallation. Frequently Asked Questions. How much does it cost to download Ultrasurf Nothing Download Ultrasurf from official sites for free using QPDownload. Additional information about license you can found on owners sites. How do I access the free Ultrasurf download for PC Its easy Just click the free Ultrasurf download button at the top left of the page. Clicking this link will start the installer to download Ultrasurf free for Windows. Will this Ultrasurf download work on Windows Yes The free Ultrasurf download for PC works on most current Windows operating systems. Prime. 95 2. 5. 9 Portable ApplicationsHardwareCPU RAMPrime. Prime. 95 is a freeware portable program which finds Mersenne prime numbers. This application can be used for benchmark, burn in test or research under windowsLinuxUnixMac. Prime. 95 is the name of a Windows based software application written by George Woltman that is used by GIMPS, a distributed computing project dedicated to finding new Mersenne prime numbers. The Linux

2025-03-27
User9183

Rendering using Handbrake, but you have to spend some time to set it up and have a decent sized video to transcode. Last edited: Apr 25, 2021 Dec 26, 2012 30,756 4,555 142,790 #12 It's just software. There's nothing saying that just because it has Intel in the name it can't be used on FX.As far as the software itself goes, IBT is roughly a 130% load on the cpu, and Prime95 small fft is 100% load, so there will be a difference in temp.But since you have a TM of mid 20's and single digits, you are fine. Even running blender or other rediculously cpu killing editing software isn't going to equal what IBT is capable [email protected] to be fair, Prime95 isn't a stress test. It's a viable program to run mercenne numbers that happens to include a stress/temp tester to validate stability and thermal ability of the pc prior to a bunch of bsod's happening. So I could see that seeing actual daily or even constant use by a select few really oddball people. Last edited: Apr 25, 2021 Jul 8, 2017 425 10 18,785 #13 130% load!? I didn't know that. I thought 100% of anything was all there was. Oct 16, 2017 9,878 2,659 62,790 #14 ... to be fair, Prime95 isn't a stress test..... Ahhhh..but I disagree, even though I agree it does to real 'work' turning out contributions to Mersenne Prime when participating in the distributed project. The thing most anybody discovers about distributed computing projects is you HAVE to de-rate any overclock or you end up contributing garbage results after days (or weeks) of calculations.In the 'torture test' mode, and ESPECIALLY when running it in 'small FFT's only', classically the preferred test for most overclockers to accept stability claims, it's quite purposefully running far more efficiently than it does running normally in order to return quick results to facilitate derating. I agree there's a practical purpose for it to help de-rate your system, so yes it's useful for that. But you have to be careful what you're testing as large FFT's only can be pretty darn easy on the system and not useful either.Balanced just cycles between them and you're guaranteed to come across a bunch of 'small fft's' that run at least "130% of load". That just doesn't ever happen when transcoding a video or rendering an image.What it comes down to is the 'torture testing', which is what I'm referring to, is pretty much synthetic and not representative of real-world activity, not even it's own 'real-world' when running distributed work units that have far more variability. Last edited: Apr 25, 2021 Dec 26, 2012 30,756 4,555 142,790 #15 True. But you

2025-04-06
User2202

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.You should upgrade or use an alternative browser. Jun 22, 2014 119 0 10,690 #1 I overclocked my i7 2600k to 4.0GHz with stock voltage (1.20v)It passed a few prime 95 tests and seems to be fine.I've read that intel burn test is a lot faster and overall it looks like a tool that I would like to use now and in the future,but I have no idea what settigns to use.I got my prime 95 settings form this guide. anyone recommend good settings for my setup ? Is there anything I need to be careful about when using intel burn test ?-8gb of ddr3 1600MHz ram -ASUS P8z68 PRO-Coolermaster Hyper N520-GTX 770 2Gb-Corsair Rm 750 Jun 5, 2013 67,881 41 126,960 #2 Give it a try with how you want the rig to run, open up a temp monitoring app to keep an eye on it while running - Core Temp is good Jun 22, 2014 119 0 10,690 #3 Give it a try with how you want the rig to run, open up a temp monitoring app to keep an eye on it while running - Core Temp is good Thanks for your reply. That doesn't really help much... LOL !!! I don't know what settings to use. Jun 5, 2013 67,881 41 126,960 #4 There are no set settings...Burn test is to determine if what you have set up and how you have it set up is stable under load, that's the purpose of it .... i.e. is your OC good, enough power, can the cooler handle the heat load, is DRAM set correctly to run under load, same with GPU, etc..... Jun 22, 2014 119 0 10,690 #5 There's a stress level setting,ram setting,times to run and a freeze test.What's the best settings to get a good indication of how stable it is ?-How much ram should I tell it to use ? (I have 8GB) -Would 6500mb be good for the ram ?-Is 10 tries enough ?-Should I run

2025-04-11

Add Comment